What HB1420 Does — Criminal History Records Checks for Health Occupations

HB1420 establishes and alters criminal history records check (CHRC) requirements for a broad range of health occupations boards. The bill unanimously passed the Maryland House and Senate, and took effect on June 1, 2026. The full text is available on the Maryland General Assembly’s bill detail page and the chapter text is linked here.]]> Administrative Law/Defense of Professionals 2026-06-04 16:22:59 https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/what-does-marylands-new-child-support-multifamily-adjustment-mean-for-you https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/what-does-marylands-new-child-support-multifamily-adjustment-mean-for-you In the fall of 2025, Maryland passed a bill that changed how "adjusted actual income" is defined for calculating child support. This significant update affects thousands of families, making it especially important to work with a Maryland family law attorney who fully understands the new rules and can advocate for you.

All parents are responsible for supporting their children. Child support cannot be waived by either parent because the support belongs to the child—not the adults. When calculating child support, several factors are considered, including, among other things, which parent pays for health insurance, the number of overnights with each parent, work-related childcare costs, and each parent’s income.

"Actual income" includes earnings from any source—such as wages, commissions, bonuses, dividends, Social Security benefits, trust income, or disability insurance—but does not include benefits received from means‑tested public assistance programs like food stamps or temporary cash assistance. Traditionally, child support was based on each parent’s actual income minus any existing child support payments or alimony, resulting in what’s called "Adjusted Actual Income."]]> Family Law 2026-06-02 15:27:13 https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/air-canada-crash-at-laguardia-leaves-dozens-injured-do-you-have-a-personal-injury-case https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/air-canada-crash-at-laguardia-leaves-dozens-injured-do-you-have-a-personal-injury-case A serious aviation incident at New York’s LaGuardia Airport has left dozens of passengers injured, with many experiencing significant trauma.

According to a report by The New York Times, an Air Canada regional jet arriving from Montreal collided with a fire truck on an active runway while landing. The crash killed both pilots and injured dozens of passengers and crew members, with more than 40 individuals transported to hospitals. Some victims suffered serious injuries in the violent impact.

The aircraft, carrying over 70 passengers, struck the emergency vehicle after it had entered the runway, reportedly due to a breakdown in communication with air traffic control. Investigators are now examining whether human error, staffing shortages, or procedural failures contributed to the crash. The force of the collision caused severe damage to the front of the aircraft, and many individuals were thrown from their seats or injured during evacuation. Emergency responders transported dozens to nearby hospitals.]]> Personal Injury 2026-03-24 10:03:31 https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/silverman-thompson-obtains-not-guilty-verdict-challenging-the-states-case-on-handgun-possession https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/silverman-thompson-obtains-not-guilty-verdict-challenging-the-states-case-on-handgun-possession Last month, Silverman Thompson criminal defense attorney Kurt Nachtman had a significant "Not Guilty" verdict for a client facing serious charges involving the possession of a firearm with a missing serial number. This victory serves as a vital reminder of the importance of your defense attorney’s ability to scrutinize the underlying law and associated case law in which you’ve been charged.

The Background — Firearm Possession in Maryland

In Maryland, the statutes governing firearm possession are dense and highly technical. Our client was facing a period of incarceration based on a specific provision regarding the identification marks on a handgun — or lack thereof.

This case wasn’t just about whether there was an obliterated or missing serial number; it was about the principle of legality and verbiage of laws.

Attorney Kurt Nachtman broke the statute down into its component parts and examined precisely what the State was required to prove.  Many lawyers fail to take this simple step in pretrial preparation.]]> Criminal Defense 2026-02-09 06:59:01 https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/marylands-appellate-court-reinforces-requirement-to-make-demands-in-shareholder-derivative-actions https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/marylands-appellate-court-reinforces-requirement-to-make-demands-in-shareholder-derivative-actions In Howard Nathanson, et al. v. Tortoise Capital Advisors, LLC, the Appellate Court of Maryland (the "Court") reinforced Maryland’s commitment to requiring shareholders to make demands upon boards of directors prior to filing a derivative suit. The Court upheld Maryland’s "very limited exception" to not making such a demand prescribed in Werbowsky v. Collomb, 362 Md. 581 (2001).

Nathanson also encouraged plaintiffs to file state-law claims in federal court when the court has supplemental jurisdiction to maximize judicial efficiency. This decision underscores how important it is for members/shareholders/directors, etc. to consult with an attorney about a plan of action if they think something untoward has occurred with the Company, as by the time litigation arises, it may be too late.

This case involved two closed-end investment companies (the "Funds") with five members serving as Directors (the "Board"). The investment companies were managed by an investment advisory firm, Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C. ("Tortoise"). During 2020, the Funds suffered substantial losses, but the Board reviewed Tortoise’s handling of the Funds and deemed it appropriate. The Board renewed the Funds’ contracts with Tortoise in November 2020, but at the end of 2020, the Funds’ reported losses of more than $1 billion.]]> Business Counseling, Litigation & Transactions 2026-01-12 15:36:32 https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/when-a-business-battle-turns-personal-countering-manufactured-legal-attacks https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/when-a-business-battle-turns-personal-countering-manufactured-legal-attacks It’s a story we see often: a business starts with the best intentions, often between people who trust each other implicitly. Sometimes, that trust is built on a personal, romantic relationship. But when that relationship ends, the business becomes collateral damage, and the stakes can quickly become catastrophic.

I represented a client who was the rightful owner of a flourishing business, managed by a former romantic partner. When the relationship dissolved, the ex-partner decided they wanted more than just a clean break. They wanted the entire company.

The Weaponization of the Law

Initially, my client tried the civilized route: negotiating a fair buyout. However, the ex-partner rejected every reasonable offer. Instead of engaging in good faith business negotiations, they chose a darker path: leveraging the legal system through manufactured protective orders and criminal charges.  

The ex knew one crucial fact: my client, as the owner, had to continue visiting the physical location to manage essential operations. This necessity became the weapon. By fabricating claims of abuse and harassment, the ex-partner manufactured a situation where the owner risked legal trouble simply by doing his job. Our client found himself facing the threat of criminal charges and a protective order, all designed to intimidate him into walking away from his livelihood for nothing.  The business attorney who referred me the matter, knew that he needed to call in someone with specific criminal experience.]]> Business Counseling, Litigation & Transactions 2025-12-30 12:50:46 https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/24-million-settlement-for-woman-struck-by-car https://www.silvermanthompson.com/blog/24-million-settlement-for-woman-struck-by-car Silverman Thompson’s personal injury team has secured a $2,400,000 settlement on behalf of a young woman who was run over by a vehicle driven by a driver who later was charged with DUI. The victim suffered spinal injuries that required surgery, and significant burns from contact with the vehicle’s exhaust.

Silverman Thompson’s personal injury group is nationally respected for representing victims and families affected by car accidents and have had favorable outcomes for pedestrians struck by vehicles. The team brings decades of trial experience, aggressive case strategy, and a deep commitment to helping clients move forward after major injuries.

To learn more about how Silverman Thompson can help after a serious injury, visit the personal injury practice page or reach out for a confidential consultation.

If your agreement or court order does not specify your holiday or summer access and/or you continue to have difficulty arranging vacation time, please contact Monica Scherer and Silverman Thompson to find out how we can assist.

Review Legal Agreements

• Review your parenting plan, marital settlement agreement, or other agreement for vacation provisions

• Review any orders and/or judgment of absolute divorce for vacation guidelines

Baltimore County District Court

09/25/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

09/25/2025