Trusted for Integrity.
Chosen for Results.
Recent Blog Posts
Understanding DUI Criminal Defense: The Significance of Tired Driving
Driving under the influence (DUI) under Maryland’s Transportation article 21-902(a) is a criminal offense that carries serious consequences in Maryland, including up to a $1000 fine and 1 year incarceration. DUI as operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol or drugs and is a clear crime in Maryland. Driving while fatigued or tired is not a crime (even if it is a poor decision and could put lives at risk).
The Overlap of Symptoms: Fatigue vs. Intoxication
One of the most troubling aspects of DUI cases is the overlap between the symptoms of intoxication and those caused by fatigue. Both conditions can lead to behaviors such as swerving, poor coordination, lethargy, and slow speech. Many times law enforcement officers often fail to distinguish between a driver who is impaired by alcohol and one who is simply tired. This ambiguity can lead to falsely charged DUI cases.
Understanding How Medical Conditions Can Lead to a False DUI Arrest
As we navigate through the beginning of 2025, notable holidays such as Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year’s, and the approaching St. Patrick’s Day mean that law enforcement is particularly vigilant on our roadways. These celebrations typically result in an increased police presence aimed at detecting and apprehending impaired drivers.
But what happens if you find yourself arrested and charged with DUI despite having a pre-existing medical condition?
What if the alcohol you consumed wasn’t the actual cause of your impairment? And what if you weren’t impaired at all, but rather experienced a reaction to medication or felt exhausted after a long day at work?
You are not alone: officers conducting DUI arrests often assume impairment is solely due to alcohol, even when medical issues might contribute to your symptoms. This false assumption could form the basis of a potential defense against your DUI charge.
Every year, countless drivers are arrested for DUI and DWI, often without thorough consideration of their medical conditions that could affect the outcome of their cases. Unfortunately, some lawyers overlook these medical factors, which may either mitigate or completely refute a DUI charge. In my recent experience, nearly every case I have handled in the last six months—whether resulting in dismissals, acquittals, or significantly reduced charges—involved the presentation of compelling medical evidence in my client’s favor. Many cases featured individuals whose medical conditions influenced law enforcement’s roadside assessments, leading to wrongful arrests.
Silverman Thompson Secures Dismissal of Federal Cyberstalking Charges
In October 2022, Silverman Thompson’s client—an Ivy League-educated attorney and mother of two working in a career position with the federal government—was arrested and charged in federal court with cyberstalking. In January 2025, the Government dismissed the case.
While the criminal complaint comprised more than 100 pages, it was primarily focused on the alleged conduct of her then-boyfriend. The complaint alleged that our client conspired to harass and, ultimately, concoct a scheme to have his ex-wife falsely arrested using a fraudulent extortion letter, spoofed emails, and other sophisticated means. But, while our client’s co-defendant was quickly indicted, attorneys Andrew White, Eric Bacaj, and Patrick Seidel convinced the U.S. Attorney’s Office not to indict their client and began the months-long process of clearing their client’s name.
Victims of Internet Harassment: Civil Remedies
Can I Sue to Stop Internet Harassment? Like all things in the law, the answer is "maybe."
Criminal charges (visit part 1 of this series) typically require what is called specific intent and it will require more than bad language or opinion posted about another person in a single instance. And someone’s right to free expression is at play if the police become involved in the investigation or prosecution of the matter. But a broad variety of civil remedies are available to a private party. Unfortunately, not all civil remedies fit every situation.
While criminal courts are designed to punish and deter conduct, civil courts are designed to remedy harms that violate social norms and can award money or other non-monetary damages like obtaining a court order to prevent or deter certain conduct in the future.
Civil courts use lower standards of proof, like a preponderance of the evidence, or more likely than not that something occurred (which is far lower than beyond a reasonable doubt).
Victims of Internet Harassment: Criminal Conduct, Protective Orders
In the last few years, explosive growth of social media caused an explosion of internet harassment. Whether it is internet harassment of a person or a business, the growth of cyber-bullying, revenge porn, or just plain false information online has grown exponentially. Changes in evolving technology have been far ahead of the law and its protections for people.
This blog explores victims of internet harassment’s legal options and explores legal shortcomings in the ever-evolving area of internet law.
Criminal Conduct and Protective Orders: Know Your Options
If You Are Being Harassed
First, every situation is different and nothing in this article is meant to substitute for good legal counsel.
The threshold question is this: Are you being physically threatened through telephone, text, email, or social media?
If the answer is YES, you should immediately call the police. If the answer is NO, your situation still needs to be examined more thoroughly.
Case Dismissed – Assault 2nd Degree, Burglary 3rd/4th Degree
Attorney: Creston Smith
Patapsco District Court
December 9-13
Case Dismissed – Failure to Stop After Accident
Attorney: Kurt Nachtman
Harford County District Court
December 2-6
Probation Before Judgement, 18 Months Supervised Probation – DUI
Attorney: Patrick Seidel
Harford County District Court
December 2-6
Stet – Possession of Controlled Dangerous Substance
Attorney: Creston Smith
Essex District Court
December 2-6
Silverman Thompson Wins Dismissal of Foreclosure and Breach of Contract Case
Homeowners in Florida hired Silverman Thompson to defend a breach of contract and mortgage foreclosure action filed in the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida. Mark Edelson and Michael J. Levin moved to dismiss the complaint and aggressively pursued their clients’ defenses, arguing that certain key documents were unsigned and therefore violated Florida’s Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes.
The Statute of Frauds requires specific types of contracts to be written and signed, unlike many contracts, which may be enforced even though they are not in writing. As a result of Silverman Thompson’s zealous advocacy in its motion to dismiss and correspondence to opposing counsel, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case.
Silverman Thompson Partner Mark Edelson handles business and real estate disputes in Florida’s state and federal courts.







